On December 15, 2015 01:32:49 PM Eric Valette wrote: > On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did > > a local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine. > > What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed on > digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine.
I realize that the developers are focused on Digikam v5; yet, it is still labelled as "beta". Moreover the 5.0.0-beta2 release announcement  ends with "This version is for testing purposes. It’s not currently advised to use it in production."  https://www.digikam.org/node/749 This is enough for me to stick with v4 at this point. Best, -Steve
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras