On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:12:18PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 20:46:00 Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > Now speak up - and by the way, I will consider this as accepted if no one
> > > speaks against it within the next weeks or so.
> >
> > This is not a nice way of handling stuff... so I send a mail with big
> > changes the week you are off on holidays with the same way of "agreement"
> > and it is ok? 
> No one has announced being on vacation - and if people leave without a 
> announcement of vacation, we can't wait forever on them.
> > We have plenty of people in the Uploaders field and we all know not
> > everybody works the same in the team. We should try to reach concensus
> > using the common sense, not a majority vote that does not make sense when
> > work is not balanced.
> Do I read this as you saying "I think I do most work, so I decide" correctly ?

As usual, you read what you want to read and attack with wathever excuse you
have. You have people in the team-members file with have worked a lot in the 
pass and is not currently active (schepler), you have people who is limited to 
a set of stuff (dato), you have people who has barely started working with us
(pino), you have people who did 2-3 commits and not longer contributed (Sara) 
and so so. The set of the "usual workers" is 4-5 people and you have 17 listed 
in members-team.  

> And if it was about reaching consensus, we would still be discussing kde3 vs 
> kde4.

Concesus is about sometimes have to give in something realising you may be
wrong even if you do not see it.


Reply via email to