On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:12:18PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 20:46:00 Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > Now speak up - and by the way, I will consider this as accepted if no one
> > > speaks against it within the next weeks or so.
> > This is not a nice way of handling stuff... so I send a mail with big
> > changes the week you are off on holidays with the same way of "agreement"
> > and it is ok?
> No one has announced being on vacation - and if people leave without a
> announcement of vacation, we can't wait forever on them.
> > We have plenty of people in the Uploaders field and we all know not
> > everybody works the same in the team. We should try to reach concensus
> > using the common sense, not a majority vote that does not make sense when
> > work is not balanced.
> Do I read this as you saying "I think I do most work, so I decide" correctly ?
As usual, you read what you want to read and attack with wathever excuse you
have. You have people in the team-members file with have worked a lot in the
pass and is not currently active (schepler), you have people who is limited to
a set of stuff (dato), you have people who has barely started working with us
(pino), you have people who did 2-3 commits and not longer contributed (Sara)
and so so. The set of the "usual workers" is 4-5 people and you have 17 listed
> And if it was about reaching consensus, we would still be discussing kde3 vs
Concesus is about sometimes have to give in something realising you may be
wrong even if you do not see it.