On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:38:11PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 07 July 2008 16:54:26 Ana Beatriz Guerrero López wrote:
>
> >
> > - * ksysguard now depends on ksysguardd.
> > + * ksysguard now recommends on ksysguardd.
> >
>
> > Modified: branches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian/control
> > ===================================================================
> > --- branches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian/control 2008-07-07
> > 14:25:58 UTC (rev 11375) +++
> > branches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian/control 2008-07-07
> > 14:54:26
> > UTC (rev 11376) @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@
> > Package: ksysguard
> > Section: admin
> > Architecture: any
> > -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ksysguardd (= ${binary:Version})
> > +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
> > +Recommends: ksysguardd (= ${binary:Version})
> > Description: System Guard for KDE 4
> > KDE System Guard allows you to monitor various statistics about your
> > system. .
>
> This is wrong.
>
> You are trading less than 300K for a bad user experience - and even 300K that
> there is a big chance that people already have installed. And kde3 also have
> the same dependency.
Problem here about "bad user experience" is the not clear error message, we
should ask upstream change it.
> Please revert or come with a *justification* other than "I don't use it".
>
ksysguard can do some stuff without ksysguardd, plus you can use it for remote
monitoring, so ksysguardd is *optional*. Most of users have recommends by
default, and users who are cluefull to remove recommends by default know how
to read package descripts as well and install kssysguard if they want it.
>
> - and please don't hide the changes in your commit messages.
>
I did not :?
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
