Hello, On ketvirtadienis 23 Liepa 2009 00:00:41 Harald Sitter wrote: > The options to get it out of there: > 1) In Kubuntu the package is split into -runtime, -runtime-data and > -runtime-dev, so eventually Debian should adopt that and move > akondiconsole to the -dev package
We will not split off -data as long as it basically contains *.desktop files and is around ~40 kb in size (multiarch is still not here). *-runtime-dev does not make sense by definition. > 2) Split akonadiconsole into its own package Maybe we could ask upstream to move it to back kdepim(libs)? Debugging tools do not really belong to -runtime packages, do they? In my opinion, if to split off akonadiconsole, then invent another package name like kdepim-runtime-dev- tools (similar to qt4-dev-tools) or something. > 3) Split only the akonadiconsole binary in its own package and patch > the desktop file to use TryExec Why would we need to patch desktop file? We typically ship desktop file in the same package as the binary to avoid dangling desktop files. > I personally prefer option 2 since -dev should only contain binaries > that are actually needed for building software (e.g. what can be found > in kdelibs5-dev). Yeah, *-runtime-dev name would be confusing. However, I don't think akonadiconsole is so important to get a package of its own. A package where all such devel tools could be put (in the future) is more appropriate. -- Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.