2010/5/3 Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>: > No, you don't need to start -2 revision for these changes because -1 has never > been officially uploaded to Debian. This also means that you don't need to > document changes in the changelog until initial release is uploaded to Debian > archive. So basically, you can just drop this -2 entry completely. Please > remove 0.3.2-1 tag as well since it is invalid and does not point to official > upload.
OK. Made these changes. > We set changelog entry distribution field to UNRELEASED until the package is > actually uploaded to Debian archive. I suggest you follow this path too. Read > more at http://wiki.debian.org/PkgKde/DchUse UNRELEASED still is called > changelog heuristic. > > In your case, debian/changelog should look the following until packaging is > still in development: > > libdbusmenu-qt (0.3.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > * Initial release. (Closes: #579677) > > -- Praveen Arimbrathodiyil (A proud GNU user) <prav...@gmail.com> Mon, 26 > Apr 2010 19:15:31 +0530 > >> + >> +override_dh_makeshlibs: >> + dh_makeshlibs -V 'libdbusmenu-qt2 (>=0.3.2)' >> + dpkg-shlibdeps debian/tmp/usr/lib/* > > What is that dpkg-shlibdeps command for? > lintian was complaining about so files (I don't remember the exact warning, but it is not coming now - may be one of the intermediate versions with incomplete changes) and when looking at the docs I saw this, "If you have multiple binary packages, you will need to call dpkg-shlibdeps on each one which contains compiled libraries or binaries." http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html But it seems redundant, now removed. -- പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില് <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk