On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:58:57PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

On Sep 2, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:

On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning myself :)

Thanks for having a look.
One thing I like to mention: The upstream sources come with a Makefile
based on a apparently old Makefile template for libdirs. It was pretty
broken and created superfluous directories in debian/. I copied over the
current template, adapted it and applied it as a quilt patch. Is that
the proper way to do it?

I am
wondering about the strip stuff:

strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note --strip-
unneeded \

My guess is that this is needed in order to properly strip
the .pd_linux so binaries?

Yeah, dh_strip apparently does not consider .pd_linux files as shared
objects and also there is no way to force it by passing it file names as

I used the strip command from a mail by Felipe Sateler [1]



I was under the impression that dh would set the strip options in the $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) for the Makefile, so that an explicit strip wasn't necessary. Is that true? If so, I'll change up the pd packages to use INSTALL_PROGRAM and INSTALL_DATA properly. I don't know why I didn't do this to begin with.

No, debhelper does not interfere with $(INSTALL_PROGRAM). For Debian packaging binaries should not be stripped during build - then dh_strip should deal with stripping afterwards.

Problem is, the unusual filenames goes below the radar of dh_strip, and (according to Felipe) dh_strip cannot be spoonfed additional files to strip.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to