-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

>>>  So another approach would be to repackage the
>>> tarball to just include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could
>>> also use the new Makefile and get rid of the other patch.
>>
>> Instead of using a quilt patch should I simply replace the Makefile with
>> the new one and check that into the master branch?
> 
> no, that would be pretty confusing. I'd rather do these changes in the
> 'upstream' branch branch, and have a wiimote-0.3.1.dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
> created or something.
> 

The correct approach is to have upstream fix this, not us. In the
current workflow, touching the upstream branch for stuff other than
merging upstream versions is wrong IMO.

- -- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=3lEp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to