-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> So another approach would be to repackage the >>> tarball to just include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could >>> also use the new Makefile and get rid of the other patch. >> >> Instead of using a quilt patch should I simply replace the Makefile with >> the new one and check that into the master branch? > > no, that would be pretty confusing. I'd rather do these changes in the > 'upstream' branch branch, and have a wiimote-0.3.1.dfsg1.orig.tar.gz > created or something. > The correct approach is to have upstream fix this, not us. In the current workflow, touching the upstream branch for stuff other than merging upstream versions is wrong IMO. - -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMf777AAoJEKO6uuJAjdbPXJQP/2vUkNyC4obUfoYXwv/I+8ef Y1OorpSUOD3Gr+R9lJf7VpZEXkdtfb9MQQjXIKR3Vzq5UYJZKjjwv3KoOAtjL8pc yTozvHg3Slo+rEYnxfgEvw5JIC/L0MD3CPnvJUkjoEVH95thLRIxoVB5khDWTF2V KP4zxvCQfv8wMLgx82RVpr6daypIKc5NKutVk9vARxTxw8r6wcJpDH1ZMfmYAgku TXP2webN+Zo5kxACT+DUxe8Oo281obsXcclpq7DDP+HdGDEw2L445z9lz8AUSm/d ICZvlxBrWh9/AbFZwJ0/nJCYdyf+KECBWgoRIgWpi0djNxkAq1joS7GdUJT0Hj5T w+FHlNoJEPpAJh0XXPgW72HDWhHTtZj0CFa+azGLp9FgKKnLvDI+LQ8OMXD+l1ym OYdw0K5OhtqkR9PABFr3WhxvIYNZfxdAhvIG0B8Sl8p8DBASxeT2v+MPyNBU2K32 xROqvq7/RwRSZJ2IjE3jTDbGJui6Nxus+NyBtOE2Q3Z+z/CH8sZe+JkgkT4ac2uu 5e1E0iRlybS/7VS/xtxtkdQojAOOvPe/PUCdQQlYw45haWhT61zsDK/xu0AhxtUg aaC6ojP/3m/lxpSNMNdecLv4D1iPNUrdS/GoLCn2ODrFa+VGDWuJABvDGZZLkEkh P1J97cz8QjGSmaXeYbQ3 =3lEp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
