On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 06:38:18PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:58:57PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I was under the impression that dh would set the strip options in the $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) for the Makefile, so that an explicit strip wasn't necessary. Is that true? If so, I'll change up the pd packages to use INSTALL_PROGRAM and INSTALL_DATA properly. I don't know why I didn't do this to begin with.

No, debhelper does not interfere with $(INSTALL_PROGRAM). For Debian packaging binaries should not be stripped during build - then dh_strip should deal with stripping afterwards.

Problem is, the unusual filenames goes below the radar of dh_strip, and (according to Felipe) dh_strip cannot be spoonfed additional files to strip.

Ok, so unless anyone objects, I'm going to add this to all my pd packages so they get stripped. That includes pd-motex. I guess that means the package version gets incremented, since its currently in NEW?

Correct, Debian revision needs a bump every time a new packaging is pushed to the archive, if that's what you meant.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to