On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:49:44AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Samstag, den 11.09.2010, 14:19 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:Would anyone mind that I fix it and ensure this kind of breakage can't happen again, using CDBS?Eiter the patch needs to be regenerated or autoconf needs to be run during every build to fix this issue. Please stop pretending this has anything to do with CDBS, it's becoming ridiculous.
Yes, you are right that the possible underlying mechanisms are patch fix or patch avoidance. There are several packaging styles to apply those, and it so happens that we do not all agree on a single set of them.
I certainly do not find it ridiculous to mention CDBS when in fact that was my intended approach to solve the issue, and the packaging do not already use CDBS.
Applying CDBS without asking first would be considered outragous, I suspect.
Not offering my help to avoid mentioning CDBS would be ridiculous. Abandoning CDBS to avoid your silly comments would be ridiculous. Now, could we please move on? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers