On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Although I have not been asked directly, I feel free to respond.
Am 13.09.2010 13:04, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:* I will no longer offer my help with issues that could be solved using either short-form dh or CDBS - except when CDBS is already used.But I still fail to understand this point. If for example a package using short-form dh7 in debian/rules needs a patch to the source or is missing a file reference in debian/foo.install, what keeps you from contributing?
Nothing. Neither examples you present here seem related to short-form dh or CDBS.
* I will continue to offer my help with issues unrelated to short-form dh or CDBS.This is again reasonable and appreciated, but IMHO still contradictory to your previous point.
How so?First I talk about issues related to short-form dh or CDBS. Then about issues unrelated to them.
What is contradictory about that?Could someone perhaps suggest me a better way of expressing this standpoint of mine, to avoid similar misunderstanding another time in another context?
Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers