On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Although I have not been asked directly, I feel free to respond.

sure :-)

Am 13.09.2010 13:04, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
* I will no longer offer my help with issues that could be solved
using either short-form dh or CDBS - except when CDBS is already used.

But I still fail to understand this point. If for example a package using short-form dh7 in debian/rules needs a patch to the source or is missing a file reference in debian/foo.install, what keeps you from contributing?


Neither examples you present here seem related to short-form dh or CDBS.

* I will continue to offer my help with issues unrelated to short-form
dh or CDBS.

This is again reasonable and appreciated, but IMHO still contradictory to your previous point.

How so?

First I talk about issues related to short-form dh or CDBS. Then about issues unrelated to them.

What is contradictory about that?

Could someone perhaps suggest me a better way of expressing this standpoint of mine, to avoid similar misunderstanding another time in another context?

Kind regards,

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to