On Oct 28, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote:

Hey all,

So the plan for puredata-dev has been pushed off until Pure Data 0.43 is
released and packaged, so I think that the approach used in these two
packages is going to be necessary for the timebeing.

Can anyone upload these two? They are needed as deps for the rest of the
packages that I have ITP'ed.

Why did you put the DMUA field before starting your DM application? I
will upload them, although with the field removed until you get your
DM status approved.

I actually have started my DM application before debconf10. The DebConf people that I worked with said I should get someone who knows the stuff that I package to sponsor my DM application. None of the debconf nyc localteam do any multimedia stuff. So at this point, once I find someone willing to sponsor me, I can revive my DM application email and complete the process.

Sorry if I caused any trouble, I was just trying to make things go smoother.

And another question, why does puredata-import depends on puredata (<<
0.43)? I just uploaded pd-libdir for now.

Thanks for uploading pd-libdir! puredata 0.43 has changed the way the headers are installed, so pd libraries that rely on certain headers will have to change once 0.43 hits the repos. I think its important to get this stuff into Debian working with 0.42, and I'm willing to do the legwork of packaging first for pd 0.42, then updating for 0.43.



"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to