aacid added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> dakon wrote in pam_kwallet.c:750 > There can't happen anything too bad here I guess, the read() will just fail > or crash. > > I wonder if we should not get rid of this alltogether and just pass in a > stack buffer from the caller, this would avoid any failures and leaks on it. It's a different process, that's why we're using pipes, i don't really want to go into shared process memory for something as simple as this. REPOSITORY R107 KWallet PAM Integration REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D12937 To: aacid, dakon Cc: dakon, mgerstner, fvogt, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
