wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13-05-2007 23:22]: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:02:41PM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: [...] > > We have tamed CVS over the years and know how to deal with its > > shortcomings. The only real unsolved problem is lack of "cvs mv", but > > this could be changed with far less work than changing VCS, if someone > > cared enough. > lack of mv... and also > - off-line diff > - revert (on-line/off-line)
rm && cvs up; you can't do much being offline anyway. > - atomic commit Blah. > - lack of something like svk for svn (or i am just not aware) You mean "for CVS" (as svk with svn Just Works)? According to "svk h mi|grep cvs" it's supported, but I couldn't get it to work last time I tried... That would also fix the online diff issue. > anyway, it was all discussed several times, so... eot? :) Probably... -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpcODgHStRvm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
