On Sun, 13 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13-05-2007 20:20]: > > We all know that CVS sucks, less for some (me included) and more for > > All version control systems suck. CVS just sucks least for this kind of > repository. > > > others. But, if we want to switch to anything else, we have to change > > the repository layout from flat SPECS/SOURCES to dir-per-package, > > because any other CMS won't handle such layout (you can imagine how > > would SVN repo look like - a ~milion directories, and GIT just doesn't > > scale - I did a test on SPECS and got a monstrosity). > > This clearly shows problems with *other* VC systems. There is no point > in switching. It would create more problems than it'd solve.
I don't think you understood, I'm not proposing VCS change, that's for the future. I'm proposing layout change to make it _possible_ to even consider a VCS change. Janek -- Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
