On Mon, 14 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14-05-2007 00:41]: > > On Sun, 13 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > > > Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13-05-2007 20:20]: > [...] > > > > others. But, if we want to switch to anything else, we have to change > > > > the repository layout from flat SPECS/SOURCES to dir-per-package, > > > > because any other CMS won't handle such layout (you can imagine how > > > > would SVN repo look like - a ~milion directories, and GIT just doesn't > > > > scale - I did a test on SPECS and got a monstrosity). > > > This clearly shows problems with *other* VC systems. There is no point > > > in switching. It would create more problems than it'd solve. > > I don't think you understood, I'm not proposing VCS change, that's for > > the future. I'm proposing layout change to make it _possible_ to even > > consider a VCS change. > > I'm sure I did. I just see it differently: changing layout to a *worse*
Why worse? Sorry, but the only real problem you stated is that scripts will stop working, and that can be easily fixed. > one so it's possible to switch to a *worse* (for this purpose) VCS. Anything to back up this statement? There are more VCSs than just CVS or SVN. Janek -- Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
