Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14-05-2007 00:41]: > On Sun, 13 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > > Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13-05-2007 20:20]: [...] > > > others. But, if we want to switch to anything else, we have to change > > > the repository layout from flat SPECS/SOURCES to dir-per-package, > > > because any other CMS won't handle such layout (you can imagine how > > > would SVN repo look like - a ~milion directories, and GIT just doesn't > > > scale - I did a test on SPECS and got a monstrosity). > > This clearly shows problems with *other* VC systems. There is no point > > in switching. It would create more problems than it'd solve. > I don't think you understood, I'm not proposing VCS change, that's for > the future. I'm proposing layout change to make it _possible_ to even > consider a VCS change.
I'm sure I did. I just see it differently: changing layout to a *worse* one so it's possible to switch to a *worse* (for this purpose) VCS. -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpt5Ha7blEwX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
