On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Ramon van Handel wrote: > We're perfectly capable of writing our own script interpeter. As a > matter of fact, that's what we've done up until now.. Why re-invent the wheel? Surely (assuming a scripting language is really necessary) it makes more sense to use something that's already out there, to avoid learning and debugging yet another language? Python, Tcl, Scheme (rep or guile) and Perl are all possible embeddable extension lanaguages, and I'm sure there are loads of others. Chris -- Chris Emerson, obsessed Cambridge juggler E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cemerson/
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas robbie
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Wouter Coene
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas lAphy
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Chris Emerson
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Camilo Mesias
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Chris Emerson
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Jeroen Janssen
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Ramon van Handel
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Wouter Coene
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Ramon van Handel
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Chris Emerson
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Andrew Stewart
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Ramon van Handel
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Chris Emerson
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Michael Zedeler
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Elmar Haneke
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Ramon van Handel
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Cedric Adjih
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Michael Zedeler
- Re: plex86.conf script file ideas Ramon van Handel
