Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > On 3/30/07, Anssi Hannula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Few days ago AMD released the version 8.35.5. The biggest change is the >> completely new AMD Catalyst Control Center Linux Edition (amdcccle). >> >> However, there is one major stepback regarding the PLF packaging of the >> new driver. The Control Center is only provided as a 32-bit binary and >> the source code is not provided. The previous ATI Control Panel was >> distributed with source code, so the x86_64 binary could be compiled >> while building the package. >> >> As the packaging policy > > pl-ease! I find many of these policies rather hypocrite and > inconsistent. I really wouldn't mind if you go ahead and package it so > it just works. You also have my blessing to use > an "incoherent-version-in-changelog", a "invalid-build-requires" and a > "not-standard-release-extension", or all at the same time.
Er.. with the "packaging policy" I just mean the way I have been packaging the ati and nvidia packages so far. > IMHO it's the user-experience that counts. I agree, and that is why I posted this RFC. I'm asking how to modify my "ATI packaging policy" so that I can update the ATI driver package. > I'd greatly appreciate it > when you document the area's where you needed to bend the rules a bit. -- Anssi Hannula _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
