-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charles A Edwards wrote: > For myself, I would be against this approach I do not want to have to > use 32bit apps on my system.
This is just some philosophical thing, right? Because here, as was said, the app is not even available on x86-64 natively. > I would go for this option. > The user could then decide and usage would by their choice. But Anssi wants to make it required, due to the reason I stated above. Normally I agree with you, but in this case there is no other option available. - -- Sincerely, David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGDY2NN5thZBYlTwkRAnRiAJ407CGrRTOw2mR2riTYfVOUQJ1f2QCffITQ IVRaKLdUkBi5DHTIGrN/+Gs= =POtA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
