-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
First, let me say that this discussion has diverged from the
original topic to one of freedom and GPL/non-GPL advocacy, and is probably
going to continue to go way off-topic. If people wish to continue to discuss
this outside the bounds of a Plucker-related discussion, let's move it
off-list.
> This is why I disagree with the GPL as well as any DRM schemes, because it
> forces authors down a certain path.
1.) What does the GPL have to do with DRM "schemes"?
2.) GPL enforces/reinforces the rights of the copyright holders. If
I was going to be "forced down a certain path", I would
certainly want to pick one that "forced" me to retain my rights
to my creations and work.
> Especially if the entire world uses DRM, and you can't choose a different
> way to release your work...
This will never happen, so we don't have to worry about it.
> or especially if the entire world is comprised of GPL-licenced software.
Again, you confuse restrictive "schemes" with reinforcing licensing.
This is all off-topic at this point. Let's move it elsewhere.
d.
perldoc -qa.j | perl -lpe '($_)=m("(.*)")'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.1.92 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9oDCskRQERnB1rkoRAnQnAKDM+84lFo+rkZhjEWjeUE/F280GewCbBQKt
bnxmxRKJYVTYcZ7sqFgteNE=
=RYNw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
