> > It is GPLed but the source package has not yet been > > released. Will do that once I get beta 3 out the door. > > Not to start another tirade here, but you realize that > right now, you are violating the GPL by providing only > binaries, and not source? > > You _must_ provide the source at the same time as you > provide binaries made _with_ that source, at equivalent > access to the same access as availability to the binaries.
Isn't the wording that he has to provide source, if asked? So, as long as no-one asks, he's not in violation of the GPL, right? ;) (I would guess that it would be a large pain for him to provide source, so as long as the source gets released in a short time, I'm happy to let it ride.) Later, Blake. _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
