hmmm .. looks like RSVP is the answer for guaranteed bandwidth especially
for mission critical applications ..
by the way , does linux supports RSVP , WFQ , WRED ? if yes , what are the
equivalents ? priority queuing ? custom queuing ?
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Cito Maramba wrote:
> circumvent squid by simply not using it.
>
> In my experience, cbq will not help conserve bandwidth if you have
> unshaped traffic still passing through your network. For example, host A
> has it's traffic shaped down to 128 kbps, while host B's traffic is
> unmanaged. Host B can still hog all 10 or 100 mbps available with a
> massive download. In this case, the cbq.init script works well as a
> traffic limiter, but not as a traffic guarantor. If you want to implement
> bandwidth management so that a host is assured of a certain maximum amount
> of bandwidth at any given time, then traffic from all possible hosts on
> the Lan must be shaped.
> But if anyone who doesn't have a high end cisco router wants to give
> bandwidth management a try, I still recommend cbq.init and iproute2.
> Forget shapecfg and the shaper kernel module.. it only works up to 64
> kbps...
--
m i c h a e l v i n c e n t p o z o n
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
---------------------------------------------------------------
HPS Software & Communication Corp. ICQ : 1413343
Pilipino Internet Cebu office : (+63)(32) 3447847
Systems/Network Administrator home : (+63)(32) 3446427
CCNA,CCDA - - - - - - - - - - - - cell : (+63) 917-3276966
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://www.mikevince.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT/E d-(+) s: !a C++>$ UL++++>$ P++ L+++ E
W+++ N+ o-- K- w++++ !O M-- V- PS+ PE-- Y+
PGP- t 5? X R tv b+ DI? D+ G e++ h!>h r !y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
