On Feb 6, 2008 5:55 PM, Daniel Escasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> First, a background about the QWERTY layout: it was designed for
> typists who typed so fast on manual typewriters that the hammers would
> stick together. When electronic typewriters, and then computer
> keyboards, were designed, they had layouts that were familiar: QWERTY.
> Thing is, QWERTY was designed to slow down overspeeding typists, and
> electronic circuitry is orders of magnitude faster than mechanical
> levers and hammers. Enter the Dvorak layout. I'll leave it to the
> Dvorak users to decide whether they're more accurate, but I believe
> they should be faster on Dvorak than on QWERTY.
>
> -

What about the Colemak layout?

-- 
http://jangestre.wordpress.com
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to