On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Pablo Manalastas<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> My GPG 1.4.9 supports the following algorithms:
>
> Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
> Cipher: 3DES (S2), CAST5 (S3), BLOWFISH (S4), AES (S7), AES192 (S8),
>        AES256 (S9), TWOFISH (S10)
> Hash: MD5 (H1), SHA1 (H2), RIPEMD160 (H3), SHA256 (H8), SHA384 (H9),
>      SHA512 (H10), SHA224 (H11)
> Compression: Uncompressed (Z0), ZIP (Z1), ZLIB (Z2), BZIP2 (Z3)
>
> So GPG uses AES256 only for encryption/decryption, and not for computing 
> hashes.  I think SHA256 should work just fine.
>

to add this further..  any hash message digest to be use either prone
to collision or not is doesnt matter... the most important thing for
digital signature is the private key who signs the data must be
protected from others to steal or copy it... that is why we need to
protect this private key with a passphrase... private key is one of
the most important thing  for the success of this automated
election...

fooler.
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to