You don't trust programmers?

This precisely what's wrong with source code review.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Danny Ching <[email protected]> wrote:
> Very true. Unfortunately, I do not trust the programmers if I cannot
> check their work. The purpose of source code validation is not to
> check the computer or it's software's trustworthiness. A computer will
> do what it's told. It is human corruption I'm worried about. Of course
> outside of computers that is a different problem altogether. I just
> don't want people blaming computerization for failure of elections.
>
> Regards,
> Danny Ching
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Oscar Plameras <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> What you mean is the trustworthiness of the people running the system.
>>
>> I'll say one thing from my experience, you can't  use the system to
>> arrest
>> human corruption.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Danny Ching <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> I think I see where you are coming from. It is not the system we are
>>> worried about sir. It is the trustworthiness of the system. A simple
>>> exposure of the code will show that it is not doing anything out of
>>> the ordinary. Besides. If the code is indeed simple as you said, then
>>> checking the cource code should be easy.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Danny Ching
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Oscar Plameras <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A tester does not need to know about programming to test and accept
>>>> a System.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM, fooler mail <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Oscar Plameras <[email protected]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember, Election Automation Software is one of the easiest to
>>>>>> develop.
>>>>>> It is "Count and Tally", nothing complicated and convoluted.
>>>>>
>>>>> true.. BUT... the purpose of source code review is to examine if
>>>>> there
>>>>> is something beyond the count and tally thing which cannot be
>>>>> seen by
>>>>> your simulation test.. as what danny said - TRIGGERS..
>>>>>
>>>>> special keyboard hotkey, special packets, special ER and others to
>>>>> trigger the manipulation of votes to do the dagdag-bawas scheme...
>>>>>
>>>>> fooler.
>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>>>>
>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to