All Just for clarification..
DSL service is sold by the bit not the Byte.. <The difference is 8> Correct me if I am wrong.. YMMV Marvin On 5/18/10, Rogan Creswick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, alan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Depending on where you live you may be able to get DSL/Fiber with faster >> speeds. I have been told it is possible to get just DSL without land line, >> but I think it depends on the carrier. > > I'm using Qwest for two "naked" (or stand-alone, or bare) dsl accounts > -- one in SW and another in Seattle. If I remember correctly, not > using a land line saves ~50% of the land-line cost, but they still > charge something on top of the base DSL price. What it amounts to is > $35 flat for the first year, and that bounces up to about $48 > (guessing) for the "price for life". That covers service up to > 7.5mbps, if your location supports it. > > Every DSL provider I've used since ~2002 has offered DSL without a > phone line, but there is definitely some self-selection going on ;) (I > honestly don't recall if I had to search them out or not). > > All-in-all, I'm content with Qwest. It's fast enough for me, latency > is fine, it's not too expensive, and they aren't Comcast. > > --Rogan > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
