hello. my apologies for the delay in answering. anyway...you started off
a thread with the subject "kernel panic" as a reply to "Lynx http_proxy
- excluding some domain". you'll realize what i'm talking about when you
visit this url:
http://lists.q-linux.com/pipermail/plug/2000-September/thread.html
look for the "lynx..." thread, near the end of the page. you'll see that
your message landed right smack in the middle of the discussion thread.
there's not much difference between clicking/choosing "compose" rather
than "reply" when you start a new thread, and though having correct
thread trees might not mean much to you, it might for some people.
anyway, i hope to end this thread with this message, and let's just move
on na. there's a beautiful linux world out there to enjoy.
vince.
p.s.
to froilan: "offended" may be too strong a word. i certainly did not
feel that way.
Raymond wrote:
> hi vince...
>
> may i ask what thread you are talking about? i scanned the previous
> postings that i did to see if i erred and i think there was none. you
> might not have noticed that the subject says "kernel panic" and i was
> asking for some insights regarding the kernel panic error that i got
> when i tried recompiling my kernel. now if you think that i destroyed
> something, then im sorry.
>
> to rafael, thanks for the input. i guess thats where i got it wrong. i
> missed something when I added/deleted some kernel support while im
> doing a 'make menuconfig'.
>
> thanks again...
>
>
> At 04:00 PM 10/1/00 +0800, vince cagud wrote:
>
>
>> some list etiquette reminder. don't reply to a thread when you're
>> starting another topic. it destroys the discussion tree for the rest
>> of
>> us who use it a lot.
>>
>>
>> vince.
>
>
> Raymond C. Lanuza
> Philworld Online Corp.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
