On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Horatio B. Bogbindero wrote:
>
> > > Is this true???
> > >
> > > http://www.byte.com/column/BYT20010130S0010
> > > _
> >
> > yup.
> >
> i had really no doubt about this. however, you must give the kernel
> developers some credit because the numbers were quite close now as
> compared to the 2.2 numbers. this means that linux is improving and
> unlike the BSDs it seems to be improving faster.
>
> BSD has a more bureaucratic kernel development system. linux is a
> more liberal but monocratic systems. BSD, correct me if i am wrong,
> some what resembles the catherdral... while linux is really a bazaar.
>
And there is a fact that is untrue - that BSD and linux run on the
latest hardware.
Linux has far better hardware support than FreeBSD will ever have.
Precisely because of the fact William mentioned. Linux itself has limited
hardware support when compared to the Windows world, so you can just
imagine how much more limited BSD is.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
