On 3 Apr, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
>
> Aside from being seemingly more straightforward, SquirrelMail is light. It
> also doesn't have as many of the features that IMP has, and this means
> that if you didn't need that feature, SquirrelMail is less bloat. I'm not
> quite sure if SquirrelMail supports preference and address book storage in
> an SQL database, though. I think it uses a plaintext file (but then again
> I could be referring to yet another webmail app).
>
For prefs, it uses a plaintext file. Addressbook can come from either
LDAP or plain text files. Modifying squirrelmail to get prefs from a
DB instead of from the filesystem does not seem to be too hard, and I
believe it's already in CVS...
--
Rafael R. Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +63(2) 8177746 ext. 8311
Programmer, InterdotNet Philippines +63(917) 4458925
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
