On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Chris G Haravata wrote: > [cross-posted to the Postfix Mailing List because this was where the > original answer came from] > > question: is imap-2000c-61 radically different from imap-4.5-3mdir4.i386? > you see, somebody from the Postfix mailing list told me that this would > solve my problem regarding using Maildir via IMAPd/POPd. I uninstalled > imap-2000c-61, downlaoded and installed imap-4.5-3mdir4.i386, crossed my > fingers, and logged into my server, and access my mail through a webmail. > Message:
Yes. IMAP2000c does not have security problems \8) > imapd[26955]: PAM adding faulty module: /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so > imapd[26955]: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so) > imapd[26955]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so: cannot open shared > object file: No such file or directory] > > my current isntalled version is pam v.74. I d/l'ed pam-0.75 [which was said > to have pam_pwdb], source, installed it on my server, but i still get the > previous errors. Oh warning when play around with pam... one false move and you won't be able to login to your server... \8) To fix this, just look at the other entries in /etc/pam.d and try to use the same modules they use. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
