Michael Balcos wrote:
> Each BSD implementation (eg: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD) has a special field.
> FreeBSD, for instance, is good for general TCP/IP purposes. NetBSD is
> for high security networking. I only know that OpenBSD exists, and I think
> it is meant for developing software solutions(not sure though). The BSDs
> have more years behind it than Linux, and are providing rock stable
performance
> (there is also an implementation of BSD focusing on stability but I
> don't remember it). BSDs provide considerable better performance than
> Linux, though Linux enjoys a greater number of users willing to help each
> other, documentation/information resources, and more user-friendly
> distributions(eg: Mandrake).
Duhh!! Isn't it that FreeBSD focuses on i386 optimizations, OpenBSD for
security, and NetBSD for portability? :)
While I haven't used used any of the BSDs yet, it's all upto the admin to
setup the server correctly for optimal performance. But of course, to be
sure, why not test all of 'em and use the one that you think is the best. :)
--
[root@localhost /root]# rm -f /bin/laden
=======================================================================
Gideon N. Guillen
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Keys:
DSS/Diffie-Hellman
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=get%200xC0976975
RSA Key:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=get%200x76C298B1
=======================================================================
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
