On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Ian C. Sison wrote: > I believe this will degenerate into another exchange of URLs, but here > goes anyway: > > This site evaluates sendmail performance to be 'LOW' > http://mailsoftware.cjb.net/
And on the same website it says sendmail is "MATURE". Which is which? Other benchmarks you mentioned are pretty old too. I posted one which was benchmarked just a few months ago. I'm always repeating this... all MTA's have their strengths and good points. I'm not advocating sendmail, I personally use exim/postfix. But want to clarify the spreading of your FUD against sendmail. Your statements maybe true few years ago, but really take a closer look at your mantra about sendmail if it's true today. Your other response is the same exactly last year, and I have responded to them appropriately. Have noticed too from this thread that you responded when you can defend your position and just keep silent if someone refutes you like Rick's mentioning that your reference benchmarks are old. This is my last e-mail about this thread. regards, --- Andre M. Varon, SCSA http://andre.lasaltech.com _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
