> No kidding. They are the "Masters of the obvious." > What they are telling us are common sense... > with a sprinkle of FUD to make the story look > truthful. > > What if a company has staffs that has extensive > knowledge of Linux... would deployment of Win2K > have a lower TCO? obviously not. Makes perfect > sense? yes?
one thing here: does microsoft think that CEOs and managers can run windows 2000 server on their own, without hiring people to do it? :) or does microsoft claim that the average pay of MS professionals is lower than the average pay of Linux professionals? where did the "advantage" of being MS-certified go? of course, all of us here that know about linux and other open source alternatives know the real score. but combating this FUD and other nonsense information will have to be done if we are to educate the public about it. -dre _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
