On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 20:22, C Francis Pineda wrote: > Probably we could do that but that maybe perceived by the public as > negative "why not red hat?"
That's the same thing with: Why not Debian? Why not Mandrake? Why not
SuSE? Why not Slackware? Why not etc.? And also, why is it negative?
Forgive me if I'm wrong with my assumption but the way I look at it,
it's one way you're telling to the public that "GNU/Linux == Red Hat"
only and which is not. But if it's really a requirement to use Red Hat
Linux since they're also one of the sponsor through Touch Solutions,
then go on.
One last question. Will all the "systems defenders" install their
system from scratch at the same time and in the same venue?
Thanks.
---
MARVIN T. PASCUAL
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. No. +63 2 4145602
Mobile No. +63 919 3141254
Yahoo! Messenger ID: bintut
GnuPG Key ID: 7269E38D
GNU/Linux User No. 247127
---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---
Diskless Thin Client Networking using GNU/Linux
---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---o0o---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
