is there still a problem with dump and restoring sequences? it used to be that the sequences must be incremented after a dump & restore.
and functions that depend on tables don't get created if the function comes before the table in the dump. i haven't tried drdb but i know you can't get very big and fast with dump & restore. spikes said: > On 3/5/2004 9:15 AM, Jagi C. Sarcilla wrote: >> hi, >> anyone implemented postgresql with fail-over (clustered in think) >> I need inputs about it, your help is highly appreciated. >> >> > Some great ref > > http://www.taygeta.com/ha-postgresql.xml > > http://www.chinaunix.net/jh/18/69324.html -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
