Wade Preston Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Microsoft and Adobe aren't not programs, so they are neither
>> open-source nor closed-source.
>
> Cows are not ducks and therefore do not quack.
>
This is also true, but doesn't contradict anything I said. My
statement (at least if you ignore the typo) refutes your statement
that Microsoft is closed-source. C'mon now; are you arguing me
because you hate Microsoft or because you really don't think
Silverlight will be a potentially reasonable alternative in the
future? If the latter, you might try making some substantive points
in your argument's favor.
--Levi
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
