Microsoft and Adobe aren't not programs, so they are neither open-source nor closed-source.Cows are not ducks and therefore do not quack.This is also true, but doesn't contradict anything I said. My statement (at least if you ignore the typo) refutes your statement that Microsoft is closed-source. C'mon now; are you arguing me because you hate Microsoft or because you really don't think Silverlight will be a potentially reasonable alternative in the future? If the latter, you might try making some substantive points in your argument's favor.
I replied with the cow/duck comment because I couldn't believe you thought (or at least implied that you thought) that I was referring to corporations as closed or open-source instead of their products and/or attitudes towards software licensing.
In regards to Silverlight, I do not have any evidence for or against besides Microsoft's track record. I trust Adobe much more than I trust Microsoft and Novell.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
