On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Nicholas Leippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2008 11:37:13 am Hans Fugal wrote: >> Nicholas Leippe wrote: >> > On Monday 24 November 2008 11:31:49 am Bryan Sant wrote: >> >> Must be a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, >> >> currently worthy of a temple recommend >> > >> > Is that requirement even legal? >> >> It's a common requirement for almost all employment at the church, so I >> would imagine that's been well-established. > > Well, I can see an obvious lack of motivation for non-lds to work for the lds > church for most positions, thus it's probably rarely/perhaps never questioned. > But for a technology position, it is employment, and I can see where there > could be demand to fill it from outside the church... > Just because they have gotten away with it, doesn't make it legal if it isn't. > So, back to my question, does anyone actually know for a fact?
See: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Amos (1987)[1] Jacob Fugal [1] http://religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu/court/latt_v_amos.html /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
