gharris999;382037 Wrote: > I certainly can't explain it. If pmi works, I'd say use it rather than > pm-utils. pmi, as a package, doesn't seem to exist for Fedora, which is > the only distro with which I have any real practical experience. > > If you are having trouble with pmi, you might find some info here: > http://forums.msiwind.net/default-msiwind/ubuntu-can-suspend-more-than-once-t854.html > ..and here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/206952
epoch1970;382151 Wrote: > I *think* pmi is Ubuntu's wrapper scripts around acpi/uswsusp features > (my xubuntu 8.04 has pmi). Under debian I remember using "pm-suspend"; > there also was a "pm-action <action name>" command that looked very > much like pmi. > > suspend, uswsusp, suspend2, pm-utils, now pmi... linux is a total mess. > Choice is good, but there are times too many choices and too little > documentation becomes detrimental to usability. > > I guess what you want is to reach a stable behaviour using pmi (or > whatever means you choose) and then input the commands in > svrPowerControl configuration. Thanks. I've tried both and can't tell the difference between the two. I am having a bit of a problem with both, but I think it's a much "deeper" issue with xubuntu. Everything works great as long as I have monitor, mouse, and keyboard connected to the computer. But I'm trying to run it as a server, and I'm getting some funny behavior when the computer wakes up from sleeping for a long time without those things connected. -- philly4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ philly4's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21901 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48521 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/plugins
