David H. DeWolf wrote:
Really? Browsing through the archives of the general list there don't
seem to be many (if any) votes there. Are you sure you don't mean copy
the 'private' list?
I don't recall our previous release votes taking place there either.
IMHO the vote should take place where the development takes place as the
pluto community as a whole (not just the pmc) should have the
opportunity to chime in. It's much less likely that pluto users and
community members will be monitoring the general list than pmc members
monitoring the pluto list (since, after all, they are responsible for
oversight).
Just my two cents, but, never the less, I do agree that the PMC should
be notified. If it's ok with others, I will repost the vote thread to
the private list and ask for responses on this (dev) list.
Fine with me, thanks David :)
David
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I'm sorry to be a pita this time, but this vote should take place on the
general portals list or at least it should be cc'ed as it's the pmc who
has the final word on a release and only votes from pmc members are
binding - and not all pmc members of portals are on this list.
Carsten
Elliot Metsger wrote:
The Pluto 1.1.0 test build has been recut a third time to include a
change in the Pluto Portal. Because this modification is minimal, we
are ready to re-vote on the build.
Release notes:
*
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/tags/pluto-1.1.0/README
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/portals-pluto/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/portals-pluto/m2-staging-repository/
