David H. DeWolf wrote: > Really? Browsing through the archives of the general list there don't > seem to be many (if any) votes there. Are you sure you don't mean copy > the 'private' list? Ok, the past might not be an indication of correctness :) I don't want to make an elephant out of a fly, but I think this is something the pmc should decide: who votes should take place in the various sub projects. I'm fine with voting in this list and cc'ing the pmc or the general list, but again in the end the pmc has the responsibility for a release. So the pmc as a whole must be aware of each release.
> > I don't recall our previous release votes taking place there either. > IMHO the vote should take place where the development takes place as the > pluto community as a whole (not just the pmc) should have the > opportunity to chime in. Agreed (with the comments from above). > It's much less likely that pluto users and > community members will be monitoring the general list than pmc members > monitoring the pluto list (since, after all, they are responsible for > oversight). > > Just my two cents, but, never the less, I do agree that the PMC should > be notified. If it's ok with others, I will repost the vote thread to > the private list and ask for responses on this (dev) list. I cc'ed pmc on this response to get a response from there. My proposal is to let a vote for a sub project take place in the mailing list of the sub project but require to cc pmc. I don't think we need something more complicated than this. Everybody agrees? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
