On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:27:40PM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * "David E. Wheeler" <[email protected]> [2009-12-01T12:36:54] > > On Dec 1, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > > > > > I'll probably do this in the next few days, and will look to get this and > > > last night's discussed changes merged after 5.12. > > > > Which is the canonical copy of perlpod and perlpodspec? Core or Pod::Simple? > > Gosh, I didn't know Pod-Simple included those. I'd much prefer it be core, to > keep the reference separate from an implementation. (I wouldn't object to > Pod-Spec, but I don't think we want to give core one more thing to sync up.)
Core doesn't mind, as long as there's an answer. (The revised layout of ext, dist and cpan makes this a lot easier. Whilst said files *are* currently under pod/ they don't have to stay there. I believe that I can patch it so that the core's build automatically grabs them from the appropriate dist dropped into cpan/, and which point it's just as easy to keep canonical as every other directory in cpan/) Nicholas Clark
