On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > No, I'm saying that giving "core one more thing to sync up" is not an issue > that should affect the decision making. > > I don't have an opinion on where the right place *is*. I'm perfectly happy for > it to be in distributions on CPAN, if that's the right place. > > Although I note (without investigating) > > http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blob/HEAD:/Porting/Maintainers.pl#l1295 > > # XXX these two files correspond to similar ones in blead under > # pod/, but the blead ones have newer changes, and also seem to > # have been in blead a long time. I'm going to assume then that > # the blead versions of these two files are authoritative - DAPM > 'EXCLUDED' => [ qw( lib/perlpod.pod lib/perlpodspec.pod ) ], > > > so where ever it *does* end up, it looks like there are forks to heal, to get > back to one true document.
Jesus Christ. I don't think they should be in Pod::Simple. So I'd like to remove them. Anyone else have any opinions? Allison? HDP? RJBS? TorgoX? Best, David
