On Apr 25, 2011, at 8:39 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Yes, but my assumption is that the discussion here is about inventing POD > syntax to represent tables natively, and to do that we have to figure out > what the requirements are and confirm that it's viable to convert such POD > tables into our most common output formats. Which is what I was assuming > that Karl was doing.
Oh, okay. I'll STFU then. Best, David
