On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:31:31AM +0100, zyx wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 13:05 +0100, Francesco Pretto wrote: > > The current patch convert headers to really use > > relative paths, allowing to use podofo with #include <podofo.h> > > notation. > > Hi, > you should discuss such invasive changes before suggesting them and > sending them to the list. Your changes in public headers are wrong. > Maybe they make things easier for static library usage, but they break > dynamic library usage.
Frankly, I don't get this patch AT ALL. Header files have *nothing* to do with linkage. At the very least, it is a completely misnamed set of things. Joerg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
