On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:31:31AM +0100, zyx wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 13:05 +0100, Francesco Pretto wrote:
> > The current patch convert headers to really use
> > relative paths, allowing to use podofo with #include <podofo.h>
> > notation.
>       Hi,
> you should discuss such invasive changes before suggesting them and
> sending them to the list. Your changes in public headers are wrong.
> Maybe they make things easier for static library usage, but they break
> dynamic library usage.

Frankly, I don't get this patch AT ALL. Header files have *nothing* to
do with linkage. At the very least, it is a completely misnamed set of


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Podofo-users mailing list

Reply via email to