Yes, he can find it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: RowRecordAggregate patch


> Tal Moshaiov wrote:
>
> >Searching for a row RECORD will fail (this operation can only be done from the 
>Sheet  object). Since Sheet does not use this
method,
> >it is probably 2.0
> >
> >
> Right, I mean: can a user of the high level API still find an HSSFRow?
>  If so, I agree - 2.0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
> >Tal
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:11 PM
> >Subject: Re: RowRecordAggregate patch
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>So let me get this clear:  searching for a row in an existing
> >>spreadsheet doesn't work when you read it in?  (if so that sounds like
> >>1.5.1, if not then 2.0)
> >>
> >>Tal Moshaiov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Andrew ,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Can you explain what the patch fixes?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>A bug for fetching RowRecords from the rows buffer (TreeMap) in 
>RowRecordAggregate. The request for a specific row is made
using
> >>>
> >>>
> >its
> >
> >
> >>>row number, however the search in the tree used to search for the same row object.
> >>>I simply introduced a Comparator that compares two RowRecords using their row 
>number and not object equality.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>What is the symptom?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>RowRecordAggregate.getRow(..) doesn't work.
> >>>As far as I saw, no one used this method before me.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>does it hurt people using 1.5 or can it wait until 2.0?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>It can wait until 2.0
> >>>However I believe it should be at least commited
> >>>
> >>>Tal
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
> >>>Subject: Re: using commons logging
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Can you explain what the patch fixes?  What is the symptom?  Meaning
> >>>>does it hurt people using 1.5 or can it wait until 2.0?
> >>>>
> >>>>Tal Moshaiov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Andy, Glen !
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You guys go ahead and decide to which release would you like to commit this 
>one. All I need is for this to be committed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>BTW, I may submit a similar bugfix for the ValueRecordsAggregate.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thank you guys !
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Regards
> >>>>>Tal
> >>>>>----------------------------------
> >>>>>Tal Moshaiov
> >>>>>Applications Development
> >>>>>VistaPortal Software, Inc.
> >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>Phone: 972-3-6126188
> >>>>>Fax:      972-3-6126189
> >>>>>ICQ:      109104838
> >>>>>www.vistaportal.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>Glen, as I understand it you had concerns with this patch?  Have they been 
>resolved?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Tal, is this patch against 1.5 or against the head?  Are you intending for it to
> >>>>>be applied and appear in 2.0 or a possible later 1.5 bugfix release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Once I get confirmation from you gentlemen on these issues I'll apply and 
>commit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Andy
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>--
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to