Okay.. . to the head then. :-)  

Tal Moshaiov wrote:

>Yes, he can find it.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:31 PM
>Subject: Re: RowRecordAggregate patch
>
>
>  
>
>>Tal Moshaiov wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Searching for a row RECORD will fail (this operation can only be done from the 
>Sheet  object). Since Sheet does not use this
>>>      
>>>
>method,
>  
>
>>>it is probably 2.0
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Right, I mean: can a user of the high level API still find an HSSFRow?
>> If so, I agree - 2.0.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Andy
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Tal
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:11 PM
>>>Subject: Re: RowRecordAggregate patch
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>So let me get this clear:  searching for a row in an existing
>>>>spreadsheet doesn't work when you read it in?  (if so that sounds like
>>>>1.5.1, if not then 2.0)
>>>>
>>>>Tal Moshaiov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Andrew ,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can you explain what the patch fixes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>A bug for fetching RowRecords from the rows buffer (TreeMap) in 
>RowRecordAggregate. The request for a specific row is made
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>using
>  
>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>its
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>row number, however the search in the tree used to search for the same row object.
>>>>>I simply introduced a Comparator that compares two RowRecords using their row 
>number and not object equality.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>What is the symptom?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>RowRecordAggregate.getRow(..) doesn't work.
>>>>>As far as I saw, no one used this method before me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>does it hurt people using 1.5 or can it wait until 2.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>It can wait until 2.0
>>>>>However I believe it should be at least commited
>>>>>
>>>>>Tal
>>>>>
>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
>>>>>Subject: Re: using commons logging
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can you explain what the patch fixes?  What is the symptom?  Meaning
>>>>>>does it hurt people using 1.5 or can it wait until 2.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tal Moshaiov wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi Andy, Glen !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You guys go ahead and decide to which release would you like to commit this 
>one. All I need is for this to be committed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>BTW, I may submit a similar bugfix for the ValueRecordsAggregate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thank you guys !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Regards
>>>>>>>Tal
>>>>>>>----------------------------------
>>>>>>>Tal Moshaiov
>>>>>>>Applications Development
>>>>>>>VistaPortal Software, Inc.
>>>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>Phone: 972-3-6126188
>>>>>>>Fax:      972-3-6126189
>>>>>>>ICQ:      109104838
>>>>>>>www.vistaportal.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>Glen, as I understand it you had concerns with this patch?  Have they been 
>resolved?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tal, is this patch against 1.5 or against the head?  Are you intending for it to
>>>>>>>be applied and appear in 2.0 or a possible later 1.5 bugfix release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Once I get confirmation from you gentlemen on these issues I'll apply and 
>commit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>  
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to