Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Because this is a core piece of infrastructure that could drastically
> > affect this project, we need to proceed with due caution.
> >
> > Is CVS being discontinued?
> > If so, at what point?
> > Glen, is that a +1 (commitment of effort)?
>
>
> Consider it a +0.5. Willing to help but not wanting it to take too much
> effort. Also I don't want anyone else put out by the move to agreement
> >from the other committers is important to me.
Consider me willing to help, too. I am new to subversion and would like to
take the chance to learn.
> > What advantage will the POI project gain by switching given that our
> > directory structure is relatively stable?
>
> Personally I'm looking forward to the ability selectively to merge
> atomic commits. Tracking merges with tags using CVS is a PITA. Playing
> nicely with firewalls is also handy when I'm in companies with
> restricted access to the internet.
Yes, the firewall thing is really a big plus.
Best regards
Rainer Klute
--
RAINER KLUTE IT-CONSULTING GMBH
Dipl.-Inform.
Rainer Klute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
K�rner Grund 24 Telefon: +49 172 2324824
D-44143 Dortmund Telefax: +49 231 5349423
+++ Sparen Sie mit GMX DSL +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
AKTION f�r Wechsler: DSL-Tarife ab 3,99 EUR/Monat + Startguthaben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
