We need more IPv6 enabled servers. Many countries have very sparse IPv6 coverage in the pool.
Ask — http://askask.com/ On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Tore Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I just saw a presentation where the presenter shared his experiences > with moving his network to IPv6. One of the problems he reported, was > that pool.ntp.org was not available over IPv6: > http://youtu.be/8kHGdNLx2Ac?t=3m42s (Note: Norwegian language) > However, that's only partially true, as 2.pool.ntp.org has had IPv6 > addresses since World IPv6 Day in June 2011: > http://news.ntppool.org/2011/06/experimentally-enabling-ipv6.html > That was almost four years ago. Since then, we've had the World IPv6 > Launch, and the big content companies like Google, Facebook and Netflix > are all dual-stacked and treating IPv6 as a first class citizen. On the > end-user side, there's now several economies with >10% IPv6 deployment > including big countries Germany and the U.S.; Belgium is in the lead > with an impressive >30%. > http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html > So I'm thinking that it's now time to end the "experiment" and consider > IPv6 a production service that's offered for all *.pool.ntp.org > hostnames, including the "naked" pool.ntp.org one. What do you think? > Tore > _______________________________________________ > pool mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
