> On Sep 14, 2026, at 12:07 AM, Theo Buehler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2026 at 10:49:38PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>> The reproducer did what you said on an IBT amd64 box and I confirm the
>> SIGILL.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
>> But the same reproducer did not SIGILL for me on my BT aarch64 laptop.
>> Does it need a different reproducer to trigger it on that platform?
>
> Apparently. There's clearly bad code with an obvious fix. Does it matter?
I’m not totally following your thought process here. What is the diff fixing?
